Rats Ate Bribe Money: Bihar Official Gets Supreme Court Relief
The Supreme Court stayed the conviction of a Bihar government officer accused of taking a bribe, granting bail and signaling that the matter would be heard in detail later. The court expressed astonishment that the seized currency notes were reportedly eaten by rats, calling the explanation Credible. The case involves allegations of a Rs 10,000 bribe and prior rulings discussed the destruction of notes and reliance on an entry in the property register.
Why It Matters
The ruling highlights how evidentiary issues, such as destroyed currency notes, can impact convictions and how higher courts handle credibility questions in corruption cases. It may affect ongoing proceedings and the standard for maintaining a conviction when physical evidence is missing.
Timeline
1 Event
Supreme Court stays conviction and grants bail in the Bihar bribery case
A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and KV Viswanathan stayed the conviction of Aruna Kumari, a Bihar government officer serving as a child development programme officer, and granted her bail. The court indicated that the matter would be heard in detail on a later date. The bench expressed astonishment that the seized currency notes in the case had been eaten by rats, calling this a significant loss of state revenue and raising questions about such incidents. The explanation for the destruction of the notes offered by authorities did not appear credible, according to the prosecution’s record. Kumari was accused of demanding a bribe of Rs 10,000 under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The trial court had acquitted her, but the Patna High Court later overturned that verdict and sentenced her to imprisonment. The High Courts had acknowledged that the notes could not be produced as evidence due to rat destruction but held that an entry in the property room register recording the deposit of the bribe money was sufficient to sustain the conviction. The Supreme Court has stayed that finding pending fuller hearing.