Back
LAW

SC agrees to hear ED's plea challenging anticipatory bail to Anup Majee

The Supreme Court agreed to hear the Enforcement Directorate's plea challenging the Delhi High Court's June 2025 order granting anticipatory bail to Anup Majee in a money laundering case linked to coal irregularities. The court issued notice to Majee and posted the matter for hearing in September 2026. The ED alleged large-scale misappropriation of coal assets and questioned Majee's cooperation, while Majee's counsel claimed he cooperated and appeared before investigators multiple times.

Why It Matters

This case tests the balance between anticipatory bail protections and the ED's pursuit of a money laundering probe connected to alleged coal pilferage, with potential implications for future similar petitions.

Timeline

2 Events

SC agrees to hear ED's plea challenging anticipatory bail; issues notice to Anup Majee; matter posted for September hearing

May 12, 2026

A bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and Vijay Bishnoi agreed to hear the Enforcement Directorate's plea challenging the Delhi High Court's June 2025 anticipatory bail order in the money laundering case (registered in 2020). The bench issued notice to Anup Majee and posted the matter for hearing in September. The ED argued that coal worth ₹2,742.32 crore was misappropriated from the Eastern Coalfield Limited leasehold area by way of illegal excavation and pilferage. Majee's counsel claimed he has cooperated with the probe agency, having appeared 13 times; the ED contended national resource was plundered and questioned Majee's cooperation. The bench asked why Majee was not taken into custody earlier when he was absconding and noted he had been in the custody of the CBI previously. The ED stated there was some cooperation after Majee obtained protection, and Majee's counsel asserted ongoing cooperation.

Delhi High Court grants anticipatory bail to Anup Majee in money laundering case

June 2025

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to Anup Majee, the director of a coal-trading firm, in the money laundering case registered in 2020. The Enforcement Directorate later challenged this order in the Supreme Court.