BackPOLITICS
Ramaphosa vows legal challenge to impeachment report; refuses to resign
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa says he will legally challenge the report that could lead to impeachment and declares he will not resign. The Constitutional Court ruled that Parliament acted unconstitutionally in 2022 by not pursuing an impeachment inquiry, and said the matter should be examined through impeachment. Ramaphosa argues the report relies on hearsay, and the case could affect the path of impeachment while analysts view the president as likely to survive a parliamentary vote.
Why It Matters
The ruling shapes how impeachment is pursued in South Africa and could influence Ramaphosa's tenure and legacy, regardless of the outcome of the legal challenge.
Timeline
3 Events
May 11, 2026: Ramaphosa pledges to challenge the report and not resign
May 11, 2026
President Cyril Ramaphosa said he will legally challenge and review the Phala Phala report, arguing it relied on hearsay, and that he will not resign. He said he will ask the courts to review and set aside the report. He noted that if impeachment proceedings proceed, the report could form the basis for opposition efforts to remove him. Political analyst Professor Richard Calland said Ramaphosa would likely survive a parliamentary vote, but the legal challenge may be aimed at avoiding a damaging impeachment hearing.
May 4, 2026: Constitutional Court ruling on impeachment inquiry
May 4, 2026
The Constitutional Court ruled that Parliament acted unconstitutionally in 2022 by voting against establishing an impeachment inquiry, and said the Phala Phala matter should be examined further through impeachment in Parliament.
2022: Parliament votes against impeachment inquiry over Phala Phala report
2022
Parliament voted against establishing an impeachment inquiry against President Cyril Ramaphosa relating to the Phala Phala report.