HC asks Haryana to explain why illegal structures under high-tension power lines have not been demolished
The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed the Haryana government to explain why structures constructed without local body sanction under high-tension electricity wires in urban areas have not been demolished. The court sought an action-taken report on a 2024 letter and noted ongoing safety concerns, referencing previous court proceedings and affidavits from the state government.
Why It Matters
The case highlights ongoing safety risks for residents living near power lines and the challenges authorities face in removing illegal structures without municipal authorization.
Timeline
10 Events
HC directs Punjab, Haryana to notify rules within 15 days; Centre to decide on Chandigarh's rules; Haryana given five weeks to constitute a mental health board
The Punjab and Haryana high court directed both states to notify rules for implementing the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 within 15 days and asked the Centre to decide on the Chandigarh administration's rules within 15 days. The court also gave Haryana five weeks to constitute a Mental Health Board as mandated under the law.
Chandigarh administration submits rules to the Centre
The Chandigarh administration sent its rules for approval to the Centre on April 21.
Centre approves Punjab's draft rules for the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017
The central government approved Punjab’s draft rules for implementing the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017.
Centre approves Haryana's draft rules for the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017
The central government approved Haryana’s draft rules for implementing the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017.
April 24, 2026: HC directions to Haryana on demolitions under power lines
The Punjab and Haryana High Court, during the hearing of the 2016 suo motu plea, directed the Haryana government to apprise the court why structures constructed without municipal sanction under high-tension lines have not been demolished. It asked for a detailed action-taken report on the 2024 letter and indicated the matter would be heard again on July 8, with the local bodies department to disclose why demolition has not been carried out.
2025: Affidavit on buffer zones and municipal response
In 2025, the state government filed an affidavit stating that structures in the buffer zones of high-tension lines are not eligible for regularisation, and that only 11 municipalities had responded to the department's communication seeking details of identified structures. The affidavit also noted that buffer-zone structures are private properties owned by the owners who purchased them due to their low cost.
2024: Town and Country Planning letter instructs identifying structures under wires
A 2024 communication from the town and country planning department instructed local bodies to identify structures built beneath high-tension electricity wires and report details.
2022: Amicus curiae highlights lack of mechanism for construction under lines
During a 2022 hearing, amicus curiae Anil Malhotra highlighted the alarming prevalence of schools, hospitals, and factories operating directly beneath high- and low-voltage power lines and pointed to the absence of a mechanism to grant or withhold permission for construction under high-tension lines.
2016: Raman's electrocution and prostheses awarded
In 2016, Raman, a five-year-old boy who had suffered 100% disability after being electrocuted by a sagging 11-KV transmission line over his house in Panipat, received myoelectric prostheses worth ₹50 lakh.
2016: Suo motu plea initiated by the High Court
The Punjab and Haryana High Court initiated a suo motu public-interest plea in 2016 after taking cognisance of news reports that thousands of people were living under high-tension electricity wires.