Google Appeals US Court Ruling Imposing Data-Sharing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
Google appealed a federal court ruling that found it maintained an illegal search monopoly and imposed data-sharing mandates with competitors. The appeal seeks to pause these remedies pending review.
Why It Matters
The case could reshape search engine competition, data access in AI era, and antitrust enforcement against Big Tech, affecting innovation and user privacy.
Timeline
5 Events
Google Files Appeal and Requests Pause on Data-Sharing
Google files notice of appeal against liability and remedies rulings, asking court to pause data-sharing and syndication mandates during appeal.[3][9]
Google Emphasizes AI Competition Concerns
Google highlights privacy risks and competition from AI search in response to remedies.[3]
Judge Issues Remedies Ruling
Judge Mehta rejects Chrome divestiture but imposes behavioral restrictions including data-sharing mandates.[3]
Judge Rules Google Maintained Illegal Search Monopoly
Judge Amit Mehta rules Google illegally maintained 90% search market share through exclusive deals.[3]
DOJ Files Antitrust Lawsuit Against Google
US Department of Justice files antitrust lawsuit against Google over search distribution agreements with Apple and others.[3]