BackLAW
Electoral roll purges raise constitutional questions
The Election Commission of India allegedly used the term 'logical discrepancy' to purge voters from electoral rolls across several states and a union territory. Critics say the process, including the Special Intensive Revision, is flawed and could disenfranchise hundreds of thousands, with courts unable to easily restore voters.
Why It Matters
The purges raise constitutional questions and potential disenfranchisement ahead of state elections, prompting scrutiny from courts and commentators.
Timeline
4 Events
West Bengal: lakhs of genuine citizens removed under 'logical discrepancies'
April 28, 2026
Media reports indicate that lakhs of genuine citizens in West Bengal have had their names removed from the electoral roll and placed under the category 'logical discrepancies', with many unable to vote in the first phase of the election.
Supreme Court tribunals unable to reinstate voters due to SIR mess
April 28, 2026
The Supreme Court's concept of tribunals could not restore the removed voters to the list, mainly because of the near-total mess created by the ECI's Special Intensive Revision (SIR).
SIR: Special Intensive Revision flawed, risking disenfranchisement
April 28, 2026
It is alleged that the SIR process designed by the ECI is deeply flawed and, if continued, could lead to the elimination of a very large number of Indian citizens from the electoral roll.
ECI uses term 'logical discrepancy' to delete voters across several states
April 28, 2026
The article states that the Election Commission of India invented and applied the term 'logical discrepancy' to remove voters from the electoral rolls in the states of Assam, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, and the Union Territory of Puducherry following recent elections.