Delhi High Court criticizes Centre and Delhi Police over PSO provisions for judicial officers
The Delhi High Court expressed strong displeasure at the Centre and Delhi Police’s stance that personal security officers (PSOs) should be provided to judicial officers only on a case-by-case basis. The bench warned that such apathy could undermine judicial independence and asked for better security arrangements. The court allowed another meeting and scheduled the next hearing for May 12, 2026.
Why It Matters
The case highlights tensions between security needs of judges and administrative feasibility, raising concerns about judicial independence and security-provision decisions affecting the judiciary and other stakeholders.
Timeline
4 Events
May 12, 2026: Next hearing scheduled
The matter will be heard next on May 12, 2026, with the court seeking further proposals from authorities regarding security provisions for judicial officers.
April 21, 2026: Court observations on PSO provision
The Delhi High Court, while hearing a petition filed by the Judicial Service Association of Delhi, expressed strong displeasure at the Centre and Delhi Police’s stance that PSOs should be provided to judicial officers only on a case-by-case basis, warning that such apathy could undermine judicial independence. The bench urged the authorities to come up with good suggestions and permitted another meeting; it did not take the Centre’s affidavit on record and asked for a better one. The matter was adjourned to May 12 for the next hearing.
April 13, 2026: Meeting held pursuant to order
A meeting was held pursuant to the High Court's March 24, 2026 order to discuss security provisions for judicial officers. The counsel noted that key aspects, including security provisions in other states, were not considered, and that the principal secretary, department of law, justice and legislative affairs, was not invited to the meeting; the court was urged to grant time to convene another meeting.
March 24, 2026: High Court order referenced
The Delhi High Court’s March 24, 2026 order is referenced in relation to security for judicial officers, and it led to subsequent actions including a meeting that would take place on April 13 to discuss security provisions.