BackLAW
CIC raps NDMC for vague RTI reply on Gole Market jhuggi demolition; orders revised disclosure
The Central Information Commission criticized NDMC for a vague RTI reply about demolition and reconstruction of shanties near Gole Market. NDMC cited police shortage and the Model Code of Conduct as reasons for inaction, while CIC directed a revised, point-wise disclosure based on records. The issue centers on an RTI request about demolitions in March 2022 and subsequent reconstructions at the site.
Why It Matters
This case underscores RTI transparency and accountability in public agencies, and how operational constraints and conduct rules can affect government action on demarcated sites.
Timeline
2 Events
April 27, 2026: CIC raps NDMC for vague RTI reply and orders revised, point-wise disclosure
April 27, 2026
The Central Information Commission pulled up the NDMC for a 'vague and non-specific' RTI reply on demolition and alleged reconstruction of shanties near Gole Market. The NDMC had cited unavailability of police force and enforcement of the Model Code of Conduct for not carrying out further action. Information Commissioner Vinod Kumar Tiwari noted that the CPIO had denied information on points 1 to 3 in a mechanical manner and should provide a clear, categorical, and record-based point-wise reply based on available records. The CIC directed corrective steps, requiring a revised reply with the file/firm number, relevant orders, or documentary evidence pertaining to demolition action, if available; if information is unavailable, it must be clearly stated.
March 2022: Alleged demolition of around 45 jhuggis at Gole Market site
March 2022
An RTI applicant sought details on whether around 45 jhuggis were demolished in March 2022 at the Gole Market site and how nearly 100 structures allegedly came up again at the same site, along with information on action taken by authorities. The NDMC central public information officer denied answering most queries, citing section 2 of the RTI Act.